Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backsaturday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Prolapse (band). bibliomaniac15 21:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Backsaturday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NMUSIC. Kleuske (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Missbarbell: there won't have been any coverage in Record Mirror... it stopped publication in 1991. I do agree that it's very likely to have been reviewed in NME and Melody Maker, and probably in Q, Select and Vox as well. But it's the same problem that many UK bands that predate the internet era have... these sources are not online to be able to confirm any of this. The band did get a fair amount of attention in the music press and airplay on alternative music radio, so I would not be surprised to find print coverage if I could get to the British Library, but as this is not possible at present I can't make a case for keeping the article... it may have to be redirected until coverage can be found. Richard3120 (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.