Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babylon (New Testament)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Whore of Babylon. Anything worth merging can be recovered from the article history. Randykitty (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Babylon (New Testament)[edit]

Babylon (New Testament) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a POV fork for theological claims about Babylon. The 'Book of Revelation' section should be merged into Whore of Babylon. The article name is not necessary as a redirect. Jeffro77 (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - elements within the Babylon in Popular Culture section should be merged to Babylon or Whore of Babylon, depending on the context of each element.--Jeffro77 (talk) 22:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Whore of Babylon. No merge needed. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:06, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or redirect as others have suggested. Most of the content seems to be related to or inspired by the Revelation reference. The brief discussion of 1 Peter 5:13 probably need to be merged into the whore article, but the NT hisotrical references need to be merged to the NT section of Babylon, as does the reference to the Assyrian see. I recall that one version of the Talmud is described as Babylonian; if so, that needs to be covered in the article on Babylon. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.