Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baba Ka Dhaba case

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:45, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baba Ka Dhaba case

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable event to have a Wikipedia page. Fail to pass WP:GNG Jimandjam (talk) 12:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and India. Jimandjam (talk) 12:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Why not notable? Sufficient media sources are provided. Even highly reliable ones also. Ryan990110 (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)~~ WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 12:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this isn't a notable event or controversy, there is virtually no in depth coverage in reliable sources and nothing sustained. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi @PRAXIDICAE, thanks for your response. I am the owner of this article. I respect your comment only if it is unbiased. As you had already (recently) opened another deletion page for me. I know you had a long history of user-targeting, violent discussion with everyone as "evidence found on your own talk page". Anyway, have a nice day!Ryan990110 (talk) 13:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 12:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You own nothing on Wikipedia. Further, if you have issues with my behavior or edits, WP:ANI is the place to discuss it, not here @Ryan990110. I suggest you remove your ridiculous accusation or go to ANI and substantiate it with WP:DIFFs. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me, sir. And please don't mistook me: I said "owner" instead of author. Sorry for that. I didn't accused you, I am just telling what maybe true! Apologies, if you hurt. Again, have a nice day. Ryan990110 (talk) 13:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 12:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of sustained coverage and/or lasting significance. Also has significant WP:BLP implications. Ovinus (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.