Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BYK Additives & Instruments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BYK Additives & Instruments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There is an obvious redirect, but it is contested. Lithopsian (talk) 19:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 01:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 01:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I assume you are suggesting it should redirect into a new section in the Altana article? I see many news articles specifically referencing BYK Additives & Instruments. I don't see why it shouldn't be a separate article, since it features in the news as BYK - I think there are sufficient reliable sources (that should be referenced) to demonstrate that it is not inherited notability. = paul2520 (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, to Altana. It was already redirected once (by someone else: "Not notable, without significant coverage") but quickly reverted by the article creator, an apparently-connected editor. Lithopsian (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.