Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BTS Live Trilogy Episode II: The Red Bullet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 08:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 BTS Live Trilogy Episode II: The Red Bullet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is really poor and Unnecessary,Sources do not show prominent article.most of The contents of this page,is available in the Bangtan Boys's page and information that is not notable enough to be included on a normal page.I believe this page should be removed.(Pikhmikh (talk) 23:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

modeled it after B.A.P Live On Earth 2014 Continent Tour, and the tour isnt done yet, you never know Tigress223^t@lk 01:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- If that page has not removed still, This does not mean that is notable (B.A.P). Did you know? If you are not completely familiar with the rule of Wikipedia.This page is useless in the past Similar pages with this page, such girl's generation 2014 tour and G-Dragon 1st World Tour,Has been removed from Wikipedia ,,However, this article is not valid.(Pikhmikh (talk) 02:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]
Keep Cited sources demonstrate sufficient coverage to meet WP:NTOUR. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment:According to:"Concert tours are notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources." I did not find still adequate and reliable resources on this article that Show The importance of article,the article has little refrence and text of the article, does not show The importance of the tour.Notability of this article by adding multiple sources prove to be.Thanks(Pikhmikh (talk) 01:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

From NTOUR...Concert tours are notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Such coverage might show notability in terms of artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience, or other such terms. Sources that merely establish that a tour happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability.

The cited sources clearly satisfy those criteria. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry,have this article "coverage might show notability in terms of artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience, or other such terms"? but I did not find this,,and is sources enough?I do not think helloasia and youtube are valid(Pikhmikh (talk) 00:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.