Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BTS-203

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTS-203[edit]

BTS-203 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable firearm. No English reliable sources, but perhaps a Thai search could turn up something. Created by User:Ctway sock. ansh666 08:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh666 08:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh666 08:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. ansh666 08:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines.--RAF910 (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: No sources that show notability. --OpenFuture (talk) 09:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.