Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BROFL
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- BROFL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism, possibly made up, and at any rate, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Web search doesn't really yield anything to support this, in particular Urban Dictionary has a different explanation. Contested PROD. Favonian (talk) 08:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above; the page shows no sources and makes no attempt at demonstrating how BROFL is different from any of the 10,000 other ROFL variants. Angrysockhop (talk to me) 09:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete same as Angrysockhop RWJP (talk) 11:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is apparently an inside joke with high school students in Essex. Mandsford (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nom. Joe Chill (talk) 17:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. No evidence of notability. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.