Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BPPN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

BPPN

This is a poorly written article that has multiple problems that haven't been solved in over a year. In my opinion, it looks like someone published their personal essay on Wikipedia Tavix (talk) 03:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because it is not very notable. And anyway, there is already a Wikipedia Indonesia article on it here. That's good enough for this entity. Artene50 (talk) 04:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So what happens to the 96% of the world's people who don't speak Indonesian? Having an entry on another language wikipedia has nothing to do with whether it should be kept.--Merbabu (talk) 05:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable goverment agency. Poorly written articles (which it is) is not for afd, they should be cleaned up. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability clearly established. Its poor quality is not a matter for afd. --Merbabu (talk) 23:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep critical agency within some difficult stages of Indonesian national development - poorly written does not constitute a reason for deleting. WP Indonesia Language articles are never substitutes for articles in WP English at any point Satu Suro 10:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.