Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIG KIDD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Deleted per WP:G5. (non-admin closure) –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 14:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BIG KIDD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References seem to be mostly to databases and unreliable tabloid-like websites. Unnotable and promotional. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 15:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reason why not delete Some new refernces added to the page, all the refences are real and from well known webiste related to music, now also added reference from Apple Music. On the other hand {{AFD help}} notice only can be used when topic not according to important rules, which including three cardinal content policies (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:No original research) and the copyright policy (Wikipedia:Copyrights) this page is according to all these 4 terms. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources we can use refernces fro tiird part sites. Hope this explanition is eniugh.03wikicreator (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: 03wikicreator (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]
Delete - just promotional article only. Fails WP:SINGER.___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as WP:CSD A7 and promotional. StaticVapor message me! 02:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PROMO, and very poor English. At best WP:TNT. Aoziwe (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional and non-notable. I don't think the editor arguing not delete fully understands wikipedia criteria. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional with very poor sourcing.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:32, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article is already deleted as per CSD-G5.--PATH SLOPU 14:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.