Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIBS Quality Measurement
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete because obvious hoaxes are technically vandalism. It is gratifying to see that the urge to make fun of banal, trivial twaddle is not something unique unto myself, but all that was here was a fairly elaborate joke. I laughed too. BIBS is a somewhat humorously referred to, quality management system. BIBS is a satirical "jab" as other management systems, notably ISO 9000. BIBS is maintained by a loose affiliation of software developers with the intent of slackening the quality standards required to ship a product. BIBS is designed to make the exceedingly complex world of quality management simpler for those without the time to implement a full standard. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
BIBS Quality Measurement[edit]
- BIBS Quality Measurement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
As I declined a G3 speedy tagging on this article, I also prodded it for lack of notability, and another editor followed with a prod2 tag with additional concerns. The creator deprodded the article and changed important facts in it to cover up the concerns of the prod2 tag, but without addressing the lack of notability. Delete, and may be eligible for a G3, given its edit history. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 09:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as g3 vandalism. Zero ghits for either the quality system, the inventor, or "Drools University", the inventor's institution. (See this version for the inventor and institution, and this edit to BIBS)--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.