Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BHDL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BHDL[edit]

BHDL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, less than 30 citations in total for published papers (I could find only 2 papers, and they are both primary sources/original research) relating to BHDL on Scholar (note, many articles containing 'BHDL' are not related to the BHDL as defined on this Wikipedia page). Simple Google Search shows nothing about BHDL, have to use "double quotes" search function to find related results. No citations and references are dead/out-of-date/primary sources Hadal1337 (talk) 18:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, there does seem to be secondary coverage in one poorly cited source, Hallerstede, S. (2004). "BHDL: Principles and tools for generating proven hardware". UML-B Specification for Proven Embedded Systems Design. Springer: 109–120., but I agree that this fails WP:SIGCOV. SailingInABathTub (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to VHDL or B-Method as preferred WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Not notable to be merged into either of them IMO. Hadal1337 (talk) 20:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I see very few papers on the topic and even fewer citations to those. I should point out that I also had to search for "B/HDL" and "B-HDL" which didn't improve the results much. --mikeu talk 19:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.