Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBJ Breaks The 4th Wall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per CSD G3. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle (talk) 04:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BBJ Breaks The 4th Wall[edit]

BBJ Breaks The 4th Wall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced film with no indication of notability. (redacted per WP:CHILDPRO Nate (chatter) 01:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)), the director, producer, and main star of this film has been deleted per CSD A7. I suspect this may be a hoax or that User:Kingofthemonsters1985, the page creator, is also behind this film due to the fact that User:Kingofthemonsters1985 is the copyright holder of the film poster. This is most likely an amateur work, as evidenced by the misspelling of "too intense" on the poster. The author's attempt to list the film on List of RKO Pictures films was reverted as a "fake film". A Google search for this film brings up nothing. CoolSkittle (talk) 23:58, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete G3 Pretty clear 'using our walls to place their mess on' case of someone putting their pretend Ralph Breaks the Internet clone film here. So tagged. Also going by the WIX we've got a WP:CHILDPRO case here, so the image with their name should also be removed. Nate (chatter) 21:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I have also edited the rationale here per CHILDPRO; the name can still be seen in the history. Nate (chatter) 01:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.