Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAK programming language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BAK programming language

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.
Delete, no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 19:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.

Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:

No result Votes for Deletion (multiple nomations), September 29 2004
Keep Votes for Deletion (Lazy K), November 26 2004
Delete Articles for Deletion (Obfuscated Weird Language), August 22 2005
Delete 1, keep 2 Articles for Deletion (3 languages), February 24 2006
No result Articles for Deletion (4 languages), February 24 2006
No consensus Articles for Deletion (3 languages), April 5 2006
Delete most Articles for Deletion (multiple nominations), August 31 2006
Overturn and relist Deletion Review, September 7 2006

--ais523 15:52, 18 September 2006 (U T C)

Delete I've got a copy of the details for later merging. More importantly, the details on this langauge are hard to find, and the article itself is seemingly a raw stub. Unlikely to be verifiable. LinaMishima 02:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, out of curiousity... where do you propose to merge this to and why merge something that is unlikely to be verifiable when it should just be removed from the target article as unverified?--Isotope23 16:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep' until LinaMishima merges it, then redirect. Kappa 06:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Although it may go against radical inclusionism, there is no point in merging this with anything. If it's not notable, and not used beyond a joke, you might as well have Wikipedia Lists of people living in York or List of computer programs that no one actually uses. - Hahnch e n 17:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 19:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable. Equendil Talk 00:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Punkmorten 09:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.