Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B2B CFO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:29, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

B2B CFO

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. The sources are all brief mentions. Even the Forbes "25 Small Giants" write-up is only three sentences. I admit I do not have access to the WSJ article ("For Rent" Chief Financial Officer"), but AGFing that it's WP:SIGCOV, that would be 1 source, and NCORP requires more than 1 source. I've also searched Google web/news/books/scholar, and found only brief mentions in media, nothing in-depth and independent. Levivich 17:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Levivich 17:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Levivich 17:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Levivich 17:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Levivich 17:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I read the WSJ article and it only gives B2BCFO a 2-sentence mention plus a caption with a B2BCFO employee; other than that, the article generally discusses CFOs for small businesses. Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.