Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. Michael Watson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B. Michael Watson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was wrongly tagged with the frequently abused A7 speedy delete tag. While not certain, I think this might stay thru an AfD D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A bishop of the United Methodist Church can be assumed to be notable, and a Google search confirms his notability. Cullen328 (talk) 04:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As the head of 1000 churches, and as a bishop of the United Methodist Church, he is notable. There already is a consensus on notability of Methodist bishops as can be seen by dozens of bishops that have Wiki articles, see List of bishops of the United Methodist Church KeptSouth (talk) 11:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.