Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. Edward Tankersley Memorial Bridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

B. Edward Tankersley Memorial Bridge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable US highway bridge. The source in the article is a federal government bridge inventory, so it would likely be considered a primary source. This is primary source government legislation naming the bridge. It's not terribly uncommon for local/state governments in the US to officially name roadway structures; even nondescript highway overpasses can have names. Beyond that, I'm mostly getting mirrors and a handful of routine clickbait geography pages. When the creek the bridge crosses is so small it's a redlink, then it kinda says something about the bridge. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and is not notable per WP:NBUILD. In my search, I could only find the legislation listed by the nom. Google, JSTOR, ProQuest, Gale Academic OneFile, and NYT did not return results. Z1720 (talk) 17:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
oh, for Pete's sake, delete Named after an unremarkable county sheriff, it's a two lane plate girder thing of which there must be hundreds of thousands if not millions in the US. Frankly, I don't think simply naming a bridge makes it notable, but in any case the sheer ordinariness of this shows WP:NOTINHERITED in spades. Mangoe (talk) 14:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.