Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B'nai B'rith Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to BBYO. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 17:02, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

B'nai B'rith Girls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, does not meet WP:ORGDEPTH. Could potentially be redirected to BBYO. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to BBYO. Similarly, Aleph Zadik Aleph, the male component of BBYO, has no significant sourcing and should be redirected to BBYO. Yoninah (talk) 14:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As a matter of information organization, I agree with Yoninah on BBG only. I'm not against anyone putting out a better developed article later on or during this process. Yet as a WP:SPINOUT the BBG article is currently not developed enough for existence next to BBYO. At Aleph Zadik Aleph the situation is clearly different. Redirect for now unless things change. Ping me if they do. gidonb (talk) 06:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Gidonb: the entire Aleph Zadik Aleph article is sourced to one source. I just nominated it for deletion. Yoninah (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hi Yoninah, thank you for notifying me. I'll look at the AZA AfD later. gidonb (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Given the vast amounts of sources, my opinion on AZA is unchanged. The amount of sources IN the article is irrelevant. I would love to change to keep here is well but right now all BBG info is or can be added to BBYO. Ping me if the article is significantly expanded. gidonb (talk) 03:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.