Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azusa Itagaki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 05:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Azusa Itagaki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, the subject's blog, commercial websites, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO or WP:NACTOR. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per reasoning given Qaei ☎ 01:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Self published sources lack the required independence and fail verification that the subject is worthy of note per WP:NRV, WP:N, and ANYBIO. Trivial coverage in directory listings is insufficient for qualifying as notable. Fails BLP. Not a platform for promotion per WP:PROMO ---Steve Quinn (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:PORNBIO or WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 18:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.