Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azme Alishan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Azme Alishan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this event was so significant that WP needs an article on this topic. No encyclopedic value with very little coverage, mostly routine. Fails WP:PERSISTENCE and WP:NEVENT. Störm (talk) 16:54, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 07:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: unsourced original research. Fails WP:NORG / WP:NEVENT. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Azme Alishan Campaign (2010 - 2013) was a nationwide social awareness campaign in Pakistan. I was able to find news coverage on this campaign by 3 major newspapers -- Dawn, The Express Tribune and The Nation (Pakistan). So I have added 8 new references to the article from them. True, the article was left unsourced to begin with. Looked to me that article title (Azme Alishan) was also incomplete. It was a 3 year campaign according to the newspapers, so I Moved page to add the word Campaign to the article title. Redid the article as best as I could. It reminds me of "Just Say No" drug awareness campaign launched by former first lady Nancy Reagan in the 1980s in the US. Ngrewal1 (talk) 20:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, sorry I forgot to mention for our non-Urdu-speaking readers, Azme Alishan Campaign means The Great Resolve Campaign. Ngrewal1 (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - No impact in longer term, part of routine patriotic events, fails WP:NEVENT. Reagan's campaign created impact hence meets WP:NEVENT. Störm (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Störm: No impact? How can you say that with such AUTHORITY? Many independent newspapers gave the campaign news coverage for 3 years. Can you be also asked to back your conclusion up with a reliable reference here that the campaign had no impact? Just because you are a Deletion nominator, you should give it a thought before you dismiss so quickly other people's work on this Discussion Forum. I have spent some time improving this article. I at least acknowledged above that the article was unreferenced, when you nominated it for Deletion. Ngrewal1 (talk) 15:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Let's graciously sidestep the WP:OR violation and cite WP:NEVENT. -The Gnome (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Again, It was NOT a SINGLE EVENT lasting for a couple of days somewhere. It was a nationwide Social Awareness Campaign where music concerts by famous musicians and sports events for its benefit were held for a period of 3 years in the 2 largest cities of Pakistan -- Lahore and Karachi. News coverage of this campaign by many independent reliable newspapers persisted over a period of 3 years. Please note that Original Research (OR) and the article being unreferenced problem was solved, when I spent time on improving it and redid the article and provided 8 new references. Ngrewal1 (talk) 14:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Fails to NEVENT. Otherwise there's an automatic bias in favor of one-time events, which manages to gain a few articles during that span against events that happen consecutively every year (for a few years) and hence manages to get the same number of articles, every year at the time of happening. Thus, as I look at whether the event has been any mentioned in a significant manner post-completion of it's course or mentioned in any scholarly source/book(s), I spot nothing which emphasizes the failure of NEVENT.∯WBG^converse 11:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.