Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azimo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Azimo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted 4 years ago. Recreated two years ago by a WP:SPA (clearly the usual fly-by-night undisclosed PAID editor; whose draft on that topic was declined and deleted, but then he presumably just created this in the mainspace; ping draft reviewers(?) User:Robert McClenon, User:Randykitty, User:1989). I've asked for comments on talk two years ago, nobody replied, the article hasn't improved and IMHO still fails WP:NCORP. Coverage is limited to reprinted press-releases (about funding/etc.); a few mentions in passing (the BBC piece is the best, but it is still effectively just a few sentences, mostly WP:INTERVIEW). WP:BEFORE check for new sources reveals nothing but a few newer press releases, like about their recent expansion into Dutch territories. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, WP:CORPSPAM, and NCORP fail. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Confirm the nom's assessment of the sources: press releases, softball interviews, listicles, and other trivial coverage. One primary source confirming they are registered with the Financial Conduct Authority, lol. -- Scott Burley (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trivial coverage, promotional. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.