Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azamara Club Cruises

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Azamara Club Cruises

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted by PROD, but then restored, so full AfD needed now. Just like when it failed the PROD, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP Joseph2302 (talk) 02:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability is not even asserted. Obviously, the parent article, Royal Caribbean Cruises, is notable but there's no reason this needs to be a separate article. --Yamla (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, re-create as a redirect to Royal Caribbean Cruises. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm surprised to see all revisions of this being WP:UNDELETED including the apparent copyright violations. At this point I think it's best to delete. A redirect to Royal Caribbean Cruises is appropriate, but a quick search for sources - only God knows how much of it is churnalism - could suggest that the company is notable for a stand-alone article. — Sam Sailor 05:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 05:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.