Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azúcar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Azúcar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was nominated for speedy deletion under A1 (no context), but I don't believe it qualifies as that or any other speedy category. However, I also don't see any evidence of notability, so i'm bringing it here because it appears to fail WP:MUSIC. Note for anybody using google-fu, the song's name is also the Spanish word for "sugar." The WordsmithCommunicate 06:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
KeepI added some information.Chelo61 (talk) 06:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
-Delete- No notability. Also, chelso61 needs to understand that deleting the AfD to this page and ignoring the fact that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and ignoring others around him/her is a general no-no, and may lead to administrative action. Not saying this to discourage him/her from editing, but I think some time to review the policies may help. Cutno (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this hapless spam. Qworty (talk) 04:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no charting, no covers, not enough material to grow beyond a stub, so it fails WP:NSONGS.—Kww(talk) 00:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.