Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aysar Qasim Mohammed
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aysar Qasim Mohammed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
For a footballer to be notable, they must meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. The latter clearly states that [sports] biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. I have searched in Swedish and Arabic and not found any sources that meet requirements. Draft:Aysar Qasim Mohammed already exists. Source analysis to follow. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Iraq. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete unless someone can add "at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources." Cullen328 (talk) 23:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 03:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The references don’t establish notability per WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:NATHLETE, not to mention WP:NBIO. I did my own search for any sources that might have been missed and didn’t find any that would qualify as reliable, secondary, and independent. Based on these findings, deletion is appropriate. Shawn Teller (talk) 17:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.