Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aya Medel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 05:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic article about a realitively non-notable porn star. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 01:00, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per own nomination, contains no useful content. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 01:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Shinmawa 02:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I wish all those porn flicks didn't make her ineligible for speedy deletion Segv11 (talk/contribs) 02:44, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable biography. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-16 05:04Z
- Strong Keep. Don't people check this stuff before nominating and voting? She had a featured role in a film reviewed by the New York Times [1] and treated seriously by other critics [2] . Monicasdude 15:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The New York Times link above is not to a published review, but to the Times' website, which includes a list of just about every movie ever made, along with a two sentence summary ("trashy melodrama") taken from the All Movie Guide. If appearing in a movie listed on the Times' website or the All Movie Guide is notable, then essentially everyone who has ever appeared in a released film is notable.--MayerG 20:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right about the review being from the Times website/AMG rather than the Times itself; I didn't catch that. But the actress has an extensive IMDB entry and a featured role in a film shown at the notable Vancouver International Film Festival. Why isn't that enough? Monicasdude 21:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although she is as notable as the myriad of other non-notable porn stars on Wikipedia, the article is just a bad listing of her non-notable films. Or redirect to the Phillipine Wikipedia (is there one?) -Nv8200p talk 21:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I don't see why a not so notable porn star has to appear here, and the films are non notable. --Terence Ong 13:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.