Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axonify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Axonify

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. There is some secondary sources, but most seem to be sponsored in trade papers. Was sitting as a draft for several months at AFC, [[1]] but was rejected. Still reads like an Ad. I think it is well past borderline for delete!. scope_creep 17:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft and userfy to author as although the article is admirable for being neat and sourced, News, Books and Highbeam also found more links but maybe not enough for better improvement. Notifying past users Jodi.a.schneider, DGG and Sanskari. SwisterTwister talk 01:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The references are reprinted PR. We have to look what the reverences say, not ust where they are published. DGG ( talk ) 03:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nomination and DGG. In addition, the article fails the notability criteria for WP:ORG. — Sanskari ^Hangout 13:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.