Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awsam Wasfy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awsam Wasfy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted previously due to concerns about notability and immediately recreated. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 04:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It doesn't quite seem accurate to describe the PROD as "concerns about notability", though it's tough for a non-admin to tell. The given rationale is "Fringe theory concerns", which while not something I consider an appropriate deletion rationale is certainly worth noting for an article that at the time was a puff piece for a "researcher in the field of curing homosexuality". After the article's recreation in the same form, I stubbed it and concluded from the sourcing I found that this was a borderline case. Vaticidalprophet 06:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated it as "Fringe theory + concerns below", the concerns below being an endorsement saying "completely non-notable". – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Justi yaya 10:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Justi yaya 10:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I also think this is a borderline case, but am leaning towards WP:ANYBIO not being met here. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete FRINGE has nothing to do with it. We wouldn't keep an article about even the most orthodox MD if itt had so little content or sourcing. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BLP.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 10:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.