Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aw Phayar Galaxy burmese royal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 16:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aw Phayar Galaxy burmese royal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written article about a fictional character (?). No hits on google. ♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 14:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. "Galaxy" may have been a typo for "Galay", the latter of which appears to be a Burmese name. But, nevertheless, this article contains an unusual number of lacunae: His Sister , . . . was exiled with the King and Queen. Her heir, . . . ? bore a son, Aw Phayar Galaxy. He lives in _______ . It's not clear to me why someone would start an article in this condition. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks to me like a bio of someone claiming to be the last descendent of Thibaw Min, the last king of Burma. The genealogy of the dynasty linked from that article doesn't always provide names of descendents born in that period, much less prove he was the last. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources and it looks like someone was just guessing as to all of the information given. There is no verifiability for this article. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 05:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There might be a valid reason for an article on this person, but the present article doesn't even have the proper name, let alone any accurate information or sources. As a Guild of Copy Editors member, I say it is better to delete this article than to attempt any editing at all --DThomsen8 (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.