Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avenir Telecom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 08:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Avenir Telecom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine non-notable business, a a telecommunication products' distributor and related services' provider, which is not particularly informative. They are apparently publicly traded on a French penny-stock market. It's apparently majorly owned by the holding OXO, a business we don't have an article on, and has has more than 671 retail locations for the Internity brand, which we don't have an article on either. The references are to business directories and self-hosted documents, and I find nothing better than reams of routine, press release driven, business-page notices of routine statements and transactions. This has been deleted previously via proposed deletion; recomment WP:SALT. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 05:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 05:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 05:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral as creator of the current article. I decided to write it because the company was of certain scale and a member of the CAC Small at some point, but problably it can be deleted without harm, being a marginal note in French-based enterprises. The same can be said of almost all the CAC Small companies, even various with articles at the moment, because they use to have a very narrow and little-scale scope of activities. Regards. Urbanoc (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails to have a "demonstrable effect" as mentioned in WP:ORGSIG Richard-of-Earth (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Publicly traded company with worldwide marketshare. The page needs more references and a picture of the headquarters, but it should not be deleted.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep unobjectionable nonpromotional article on a small but moderately notable company. If it were promotional, I would be saying delete without the least hesitation. DGG ( talk ) 03:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.