Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avenida Reforma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 05:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Avenida Reforma[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unable to establish WP:N using the english-language sources I am limited to. Only previous source was a forum posting. Regardless, poorly written and if kept may need to be stub-ified. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 02:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If it needs sources and you haven;t the ability to find them, ask people who do know the language, rather than limit WP to the sphere of your own knowledge--none of us knows everything, but between us all, enWP covers the world. If what it needs stubbifying, it doesn't need deletion--Actually, it needs the opposite--it needs additional material. DGG ( talk ) 19:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A major thoroughfare in a major capital city, don't see how it does not meet WP:NGEO. There's a very important avenue in Mexico City with the same name (I think), if it's anything like this one then it certainly is notable. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to be a major thoroughfare. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.