Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar State

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 02:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar State[edit]

This article is about a defense mechanism in a fictional show. It has no notability whatsoever. In fact, the only time this topic would come up in any article would be in a plot summary. In addition, there are absolutely no third-party sources (let alone reliable sources) for this article. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 02:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- — Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 02:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, completely non-notable. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 09:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant details to Avatar: the Last Airbender article Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Aang. The Avatar: the Last Airbender article is already large while the Aang article does discuss the Avatar state. Web Warlock (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable fictional element which has not received significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. Doctorfluffy (fart in my face) 04:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteThis is an article about a very small part of a TV show. That alone should clinch it. Also, not that much information and no notability from third party sources. Not like other aspects of the show. SkepticBanner (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.