Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar: The Last Airbender media information (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Nakon 16:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar: The Last Airbender media information[edit]

There is really no point to this article. Most of the information is already in the main article, and everything else consists of useless facts that aere not needed on Wikipedia. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 11:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —— Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 12:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The Avatar: The Last Airbender WikiProject has been notified of this debate. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 12:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There might be a couple useful facts that aren't already covered here, but as the nom points out, most of this is either a.) already covered in the main article, or b.) fancruft. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 12:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This expands on what is already inside the main article, so I say change the title, but all-in-all keep it. Hooty88888 (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Carefully move any remaining good information to the marketing portion of the main article, then delete. Hewinsj (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any useful information to the main article. Stifle (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect without deleting per Wikipedia:Merge and delete. Verfifiable out of universe information of a recognizable series can be salvagaed in some capacity. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 16:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TenPoundHammer, nothing to merge. AnmaFinotera (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Merge per above.Divinediscourse (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Per the GFDL, it is illegal to delete and merge, we merge and redirect without deletion. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. No point to a merge. Eusebeus (talk) 22:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please note that per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Divinediscourse Divinediscourse (who voted "delete" above) is using a sock account in multiple AfDs. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

However, he has not done so here (with the confirmed second account being Insearchofintelligentlife). Please make sure you note that in other AfDs you post this notice too, so as to ensure any sock voting can be properly seen rather than making it appear the AfD has beebn invalidated or somehow flooded with false votes. AnmaFinotera (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a lager issue of the two accounts just being used for rapid AfD "votes" (see here and here) and given that, we probably should not take into consideration any such "votes." Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 22:03, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per Collectonian and TenPoundHammer, no material to merge. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 04:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no harm in a worst case scenario in redirecting without deletion in order to keep contributions public. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 04:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good and notable info, well-sourced. Everyking (talk) 05:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.