Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic (Nicki Minaj song) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. (non-admin closure) Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic (Nicki Minaj song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable; barely appearing on two music charts is the song's only claim to notability. Adabow (talk) 06:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Adabow (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect To Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. And protect. While there is some independent coverage there, this fails WP:NSONGS. It's fairly easy to merge a subset of the sourced information here into the album's article. The redirect is only because it's old enough at this point. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded and protect. The coverage is about the album not the track and, as the nominator says, it barely registered on national charts! Sionk (talk) 09:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Per both above JayJay^{What did I do?} 17:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.