Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authority Nutrition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There have been enough input. Closing now and will conduct history split to revert hijack vandalism. Alex Shih (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Authority Nutrition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. I declined the G11 because I didn't think it met that criterion, but I agree that it should not be in Wikipedia, and am taking it to AfD instead. None of the sourcing amounts to notability under our cirteria, and the article was likely created with the intent to promote the subject. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and a very large trout to TonyBallioni for making editors deal with this move vandalism. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks to me to be a plain vanilla WP:WEB failure: I can't find any reliable sources that discuss the website. Adam9007 (talk) 00:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is not a notable website. This is not the place for quibbling about the process. Come on. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to demonstrate notability. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 03:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Move the first three revisions over H&I to restore the original history of that page. (The current history of that page should be deleted.) Leave the remaining revisions deleted at this title (per above delete !votes). — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:N/WP:WEB/WP:SPAM failure; it's an average clickbait site among many. Also don't bother with the H&I revision move; this was a WP:SPA hijacking by Patel the empty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) pure and simple, and why we let this go two years beyond their block is surprising. Nate • (chatter) 04:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.