Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autech Software and Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autech Software and Design[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Highest degree or promotions. Wikipedia used as dumping corporate profile and the way it is written completely influenced by company or made by their team alone. Being old is not a criteria for Encyclopedic notability. Light2021 (talk) 14:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG and also WP:CORPDEPTH. Nothing in Google News. The references in the article are either not independent, brief mentions, or from unreliable sources. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Spam article Nick-D (talk) 08:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hardly any coverage in reliable third party sources. The article is also G11 eligible at this point. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a client prospectus in the guise of a Wikipedia article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.