Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australians in Lebanon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Australians in Lebanon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is not clear why this group of people is notable enough to have their own article. Two sources are provided, both of which just mention Australian citizens living in Lebanon, but there is no significant coverage. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pretty much no expansion since 2011 when it was created. No implication of notability. Could be included in other articles very easily. Wugapodes (talk) 02:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom . Not notable lacks WP:SIGCOV. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{It will rain} 06:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nom's rationale. Simply not enough coverage to show that this particular group is significant enough to warrant a stand-alone article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.