Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian veterans of Afghanistan and Iraq
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 10:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Australian veterans of Afghanistan and Iraq[edit]
- Australian veterans of Afghanistan and Iraq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We have separate articles for the Australian involvement in Afghanistan (Operation Slipper) and Iraq (Australian contribution to the 2003 invasion of Iraq) as well as the campaign medals awarded for these two separate wars (Afghanistan Medal (Australia) and Iraq Medal (Australia)), so an article which combines veterans of both wars and the different campaign medals they're entitled to seems unnecessary and awkward. Nick-D (talk) 04:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 04:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 04:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As nominator points out, there is room in the other articles to include information about the individual service medals and notable veterans, which seems to be the purpose of this article. Mandsford (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/merge to Operation Slipper and Iraq Australian contribution to the 2003 invasion of Iraq Ikip (talk) 16:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete after merging material at other articles noted. Buckshot06(prof) 21:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. All information in this article is covered, in more detail I might add, in other articles. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 02:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Anotherclown (talk) 07:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per non. - Shiftchange (talk) 00:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.