Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Wildlife Secrets Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Wildlife Secrets Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

declined prod. Fails WP:GNG. Only 1 gnews hit LibStar (talk) 23:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant delete Looks like it should be notable but cannot find any real independent reliable secondary sources. Aoziwe (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I found one peer-reviewed journal article (Benjamin L. Allen; et al. (2013), "As clear as mud: A critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes", Biological Conservation, 159: 158–174) that mentions the magazine as a "popular media" source. This does give it some notability, but I still believe that it warrants a deletion. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.