Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Air Defence Areas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Air Defence Areas[edit]

Australian Air Defence Areas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant and poorly sourced. The commands in this stub are fully covered by the more detailed and accurately framed RAAF area commands article (they were not simply "air defence commands" and existed before SWPA's formation and after its disbandment); the sole reference, ozatwar, is not considered a reliable source. Ian Rose (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC) Ian Rose (talk) 12:58, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete clearly redundant to RAAF area commands. Probably could have been boldly redirected instead of bringing to AfD. --AussieLegend () 14:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Considered that but as the term was not officially used (to my knowledge) I figured best to remove entirely. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • That's fair enough I suppose. Prior to this AfD the article had only seen 38 views in the last 90 days, so it's obviously not a very searched for term. --AussieLegend () 08:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as redundant article. Covered by RAAF area commands. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. (Thanks. Missed the other article when I deorphaned. But the deorphaning has worked exactly as it should; brought the article to the wikicommunity's attention!) Eno Lirpa (talk) 21:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't think that Australia has ever had "air defence areas", and ozatwar is very unreliable. Nick-D (talk) 21:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Anotherclown (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nomination, the article seems to have been created a while ago before we had a more comprehensive parent article. Since this is now well covered at RAAF area commands it seems redundant. Given the issues with terminology deletion seems more appropriate than a redirect. Anotherclown (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as discussed above, the article was created prior to the more comprehensive articles created and expanded by the knowledgeable Ian Rose. Regards Newm30 (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • SNOW Delete as no context for a better separate article. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.