Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia–Montenegro relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete (WP:SNOW). No prejudice against recreation, if reliable sources are found and added. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Australia–Montenegro relations[edit]
- Australia–Montenegro relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Bilateral relations are not inherently notable (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Latvia relations for recent precedent), and nothing in particular sets this relationship apart. The two don't even have embassies with each other. That Australia has recognised Montenegro is noted at Foreign relations of Montenegro. Biruitorul Talk 15:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete these two tiny countries do not have a bilateral relationship that would make a separate article on that relationship sufficiently notable for inclusion here -- to whit, there are no reliable sources that discuss this relationship in any detail -- just mentions of brief meetings between ministers, exchanges of pleasantries and the like.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Tiny"? Lankiveil (speak to me) 21:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete I am in complete agreement with Bali Ultimate's comments. Cazort (talk) 17:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete subject to re-creation - almost no factors per my standards, but the Australian government website indicates that could change soon. Bearian (talk) 18:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The "tiny" one that covers a whole continent. —llywrch (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I am in agreement with the previous comments. Except for the "tiny" wisecrack -- that's not a nice thing to say about Montenegro! :) Pastor Theo (talk) 22:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. More non-notable Australia–Foobar relations. WWGB (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 08:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find anything to make this a notable relationship. (And to bali ultimate - do some research: Australia's the sixth-largest country on Earth.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 09:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Another mass-produced stub saying nothing, certainly asserting no notability as one country doesn't seem to have an embassy in the other, and the other's is in a different country. Non-notable in every sense. --BlueSquadronRaven 14:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, except for the "tiny" (WHAT!!!) I agree with the nominator.--Aldux (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.