Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia–Guatemala bilateral treaties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Australia–Guatemala bilateral treaties[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a mirror of the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's Treaty Database. Also nominating:

Australia–Cuba bilateral treaties,
Australia–Denmark bilateral treaties LibStar (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 12:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 12:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 12:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. These are not notable topics, or an appropriate use of Wikipedia Nick-D (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per nom. Wikipedia has articles on topics which are far less notable than this, "list of worst TV shows" for instance. A page which details international relations treaties is an important part of detailing the history of the nations who are a party to that treaty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.104.92.132 (talk) 02:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— 58.104.92.132 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteand merge, the information could be put in under the Australia part of Foreign relations of Guatemala, there aren't that many bilateral treaties between these two countries, not enough for a whole page.Socerb102 (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.