Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australasian College of Phlebology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Australasian College of Phlebology[edit]
- Australasian College of Phlebology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG. nothing in gnews [1]. google search indicates mainly directory listings and the occasional event this organisation is involved in. but nothing to establish notability. LibStar (talk) 23:25, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 07:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 07:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only significant coverage appears to be from Phlebology, a publication that is "media of limited interest", wghich WP:ORG says "is not an indication of notability". Lacks further coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only references itself Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.