The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE.--Eloquence* 22:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unverifiable, unotable, original research. Ste4k 21:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as per nom, save on notability grounds, which I don't feel need be considered given the other two good reasons for deletion.Captainktainer * Talk 21:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as per nom. ForestH2 | + | √+ | √ | √- | - 21:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - even the article admits he hasn't done much! SilkTork 16:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
