Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin McBroom vs. AnEsonGib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Austin McBroom vs. AnEsonGib[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. A quick before obviously shows that there is not any significant coverage for the event in the article, Google results show routine coverage from a few MMA blogs, and some coverage from unreliable sources like the Daily Mirror and the Sun. Neither Gib nor McBroom are even considered notable by our guidelines, which again begs the question of why this page was created in the first place. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 04:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and California. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 04:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails notability. A simple Google search shows no significant reliable coverage for the event, with unreliable sources such as Daily Mirror only reporting on the event. Edl-irishboy (talk) 13:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable. --TylerBurden (talk) 00:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.