Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (6th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. As per previous AfD. Please do not re-hash deletion discussions that have already been had, it is disruptive. (non-admin closure) Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 21:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Austenasia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not pass WP:MADEUP as is filled with primary souces and austenasia only shows 20,000 results Drowningseagull (talk • contribs) 08:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or even speedy keep which was the outcome of the AFD in October 2017. It is not WP:MADEUP and WP:GOOGLEHITS is not a good argument for deletion. I don't see anything has changed, subject still passes GNG. Would nom sign their postings, please? Sam Sailor 08:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 08:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 08:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.