Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auslogics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Izno (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Auslogics[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a bundled nomination of Auslogics and two of its products:

Auslogics Duplicate File Finder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Auslogics Antivirus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

These articles all fail the notability guideline for companies and products. They are either unreferenced or solely cite unreliable sources, and I could not find any qualifying sources in an additional search. (Note this nomination does not include either Auslogics Disk Defrag and Auslogics BoostSpeed, since whether or not they meet NPRODUCT is a bit less clear. However, opinions on these articles' notability are still welcome as I am considering further AfDs). – Teratix ₵ 10:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 10:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 10:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 10:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unless other users contribute to the article and expand it to meet the guidelines, else please go ahead and delete it. I don't have much information that I can expand on. Thanks Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 04:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Sources exist. Including software reviews. The page creator has blanked his talk page many times, go read the message at the top. My, my. The page creator will not do the hard yards fixing up the sources, this is indicated on the talk page. So move to Draft. -- Whiteguru (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: I'm opposed to draftication until a) specific, WP:NCORP-satisfying sources are shown to exist and b) an editor commits to improving the article (otherwise it's just a pointless six-month countdown until a G13 deletion). – Teratix ₵ 12:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Teratix: I realise there is a pointless six-month countdown in the works. I am quite prepared to improve the article. -- Whiteguru (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: Do you know of any suitable sources to improve the article? If so, can you link them here? If not, how are you planning to improve the article to a NCORP-qualifying state? – Teratix ₵ 14:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This topic is about the company, not about the products. As such I'm looking for references on the company. Unfortunately I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.