Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurum Ventures
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 10:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Aurum Ventures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Has been Speedied a few times before. Still no indication of notability. Take it here to resolve remaining issue over notability. Shadowjams (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there are hits that show the company exists, but I can't find any evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that are about the company. That it exists is not in question, but that alone does not make it notable. Frank | talk 12:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not-notable, doesn't pass WP:Corp, this page was also deleted as G11 once. Around the same time, creator of the article also created pages Ashish Deora - A7ed, Aurum Foundation - G11-ed (former is CEO of the co, the latter is supposedly an NPO, but the text on there was mostly related to the company). If and when they do become notable, the page can be created. - SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt. Repeatedly recreated advertizing. --Ryan Delaney talk 19:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.