Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurélien Gazeau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aurélien Gazeau[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. No indication of notability. Sources about him are mostly routine coverage and primary sources about post-match interviews. Paul Vaurie (talk) 02:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 02:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 02:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:27, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with the nominator. There are a few post-match interviews out there but nothing to build a biography from. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom and without prejudice. Based on my search, I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV and as such a stand-alone article for the subject is not warranted. If others are able to find them (maybe French sources?), more than happy to adjust vote if someone is able to demonstrate the subject does meet WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 13:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.