Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey Kitching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Audrey Kitching[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I noticed this article while patrolling for vandalism; I wasn't able to verify that Ms. Kitching meets the notability criteria. What do you think, o wise voices of AfD? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:56, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - It looks like Kitching meets notability, but barely. This article could be helpful to a good amount of people, so we may as well keep it.~BLM (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - She's famous on the internet. Woo. She hasn't really done anything notable. ×××BrightBlackHeaven^(talk)××× 22:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it. unsigned, by 65.92.67.253

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete,the article says her claim to fame is that she had a relationship with someone else, that does not make her notable. I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 18:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It doesn't look like she has any significant third party coverage to establish notability, and a connection to Brendon Urie isn't enough to merit her inclusion. See WP:NOTINHERITED HarlandQPitt (talk) 21:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.