Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey Bergot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete The subject does not qualify under WP:ATHLETE, and the only other argument, made as a "weak keep", is a suggestion that her results (she was the winner of three $10,000 ITF tournaments) might make her notable without a subject specific guideline. WP:NTENNIS does presume notability for women who have won an ITF circuit tournament of 25, 50, 75 and 100 thousand dollars, but not to those at the minimum ($10,000) level. Mandsford 20:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Audrey Bergot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:Notability (sports) for tennis players - no $25000 tourney or better titles, no WTA Tour main draw matches played, not a top three junior Mayumashu (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep, appears to satisfy WP:ATHLETE. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Seems to have done results in events, sourcing is OK.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

did you even read the article? There are no sources just external links. LibStar (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete the keep voters do not understand WP:ATHLETE. She has not played tennis at the highest professional level WTA Tour, therefore fails WP:ATHLETE. LibStar (talk) 07:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "sources" in this case are the external links also the results for the players. --BabbaQ (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know if this is some reaction to the Post-Joanna Yeates Afd but im not interested in any Meta-debate war with you. So if that is your intentions with this im not falling for it. You cant win every Afd. And definitly not a clear Keep article like Joannas. Cheers my friend,.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And you cannot vote blindly at most AfDs. You do not WP:OWN the Joanna Yeates article so please don't go around making it a trophy of yours. Could you please tell me how this person meets WP:ATHLETE? Playing lower level tournaments is not sufficient. LibStar (talk) 15:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.