Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auditd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G12 (copyright violation). — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Auditd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

System lacks notability Meatsgains (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment May pass WP:NSOFTWARE point 2 and 3:

It is the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools, universities or post-graduate programs. This criterion does not apply to software merely used in instruction.
It is the subject of multiple printed third-party manuals, instruction books, or reliable reviews,[2] written by independent authors and published by independent publishers.

The deamon seems to be an integral tool of several maintream Linux (eg Suse, RedHat and CentOS) distributions. Google reveals he is featured in numerous instructionary tutorials and I would guess he is also probably topic of advanced linux classes/courses. As such he may pass those points and be notable. Dead Mary (talk) 12:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as WP:G12 - copyright infringement of [1], I tagged it as such - without prejudice against recreation if notability is demonstrated. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.